Harvard Law (Movie) Review: Orange Revolution

BOSTON, MA -- The common perception of Ukraine four years ago was that it was one of the many former Soviet bloc nations racked by corruption and ruled by an oligarchy of billionaires.

Poster from the movie "Orange Revolution".

Today many see it as a democratic nation struggling to escape from the influence of Russia and its state-owned energy giant Gazprom.

Although the nation continues to be dominated by corrupt and wealthy interests and the people remain sharply divided in their international allegiances, Ukraine has become an icon of democratic change since the events now known as the Orange Revolution.

During November and December of 2004 hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians protested the falsification of the nation's presidential election results through round-the-clock protests on the central streets of Kyiv, the nation's capital.

Ukraine's national political identity was quickly transformed by these non-violent protests which were organized by the "orange" Our Ukraine party.

The leader of the party, presidential candidate Viktor Yushchenko, led the protests with a stoic demeanor despite an attempt on his life by dioxin poisoning which caused him horrible pain and disfigurement.

Ultimately the Supreme Court of Ukraine ordered a new round of voting, following which Yushchenko became president.

Director Steve York's latest documentary, Orange Revolution, provides an inspiring visual record of how the events in Ukraine unfolded during late 2004.

York has produced documentaries on topics ranging from American history to the Palestinian West Bank, and he has recently received critical acclaim for his exploration of non-violent political movements in the films A Force More Powerful and Bringing Down a Dictator.

York says, "When we saw during the summer of 2004 what was going on [in Ukraine] and we saw the Yushchenko poisoning . . . we began to pay very close attention."

He and his team arrived in time to capture the scene in full detail, and the product is a compelling story of how a national political crisis was resolved through peaceful demonstrations.

The Harvard Program On Negotiation presented the film as a part of the PON film series, which has featured both of York's previous films on non-violent conflict.

The version screened is currently being edited for broadcast on PBS later this year.

Orange Revolution begins with a fast-paced journey from the campaign trail to the corrupt election and then follows the daily progress of the mass demonstrations on the streets of Kyiv.

York skillfully weaves together the many threads that are critical to understanding the politics and pressures which culminated in the falsification and then reversal of the election results, telling the story with footage of the campaign mixed with interviews of party organizers and journalists.

All the players in the drama are shown as they were, and the only voice-overs come from Ukrainians who were first-hand participants or reporters, not the director.

In the campaigning before the election, Our Ukraine candidate Viktor Yushchenko is shown eating watermelon with villagers, shaking the hands of supporters, and speaking against the Kuchma regime and its corruption.

Yushchenko's rival, prime minister Viktor Yanukovich, is shown to be the regime's chosen successor, standing with President Leonid Kuchma and political ally, Vladimir Putin.

The pace and intensity of the film are elevated by lively scenes of demonstrators living in the tent city in Independence Square, Ukrainian pop stars Oleh Skrypka of VV and Svyatoslav Vakarchuk of Okean Elzy singing to huge crowds, and the impassioned Yulia Tymoshchenko, an ally of Yushchenko, inciting the people of Ukraine to take to the streets.

Top officials in Yushchenko's party and the Ukrainian government recount how they mobilized the people, convinced the police to cooperate, and avoided violent clashes with the military and riot police through private negotiations with top military officers.

The tension is palpable as the Supreme Court takes testimony while protesters continue to crowd the streets and surround government buildings.

Steve York says, "My job is primarily to document events, and I leave it to others to find the deeper meaning."

It is refreshing that York refrains from assaulting his audience with a message, and instead, he has embedded his theory of non-violent social movements in a factual presentation of the events.

After the screening, York explained that he believes all successful non-violent movements are characterized by three common elements: unity, organization, and non-violent discipline.

Orange Revolution demonstrates that the success of the movement depended on popular disgust with the corruption of the ruling Kuchma government, careful logistical planning in advance by the Yushchenko campaign, and the insistence among all protest organizers that there be no violence.

Once the people were mobilized, the Yushchenko camp used political authority to ensure that Kuchma couldn't launch a violent attack without signing a written order.

Faced with the full responsibility for their actions, Kuchma and Yanukovich balked, and the negotiations which resulted provided the basis for subsequent electoral reforms and constitutional reduction of the president's powers.

The victory of Viktor Yushchenko and his Our Ukraine party was hailed worldwide as a victory for democracy and a step toward the West, but the three years since have seen the nation undergo chaotic political reversals along the same lines as were drawn during the Orange Revolution.

Some have criticized the movement as a failure, as the pro-Russian Party of the Regions and its leader, Viktor Yanukovich, have at times held a coalition in the parliament.

York responds, "The Orange Revolution should not be criticized for failure to achieve that which was not its goal."

The film's final scene, workers taking out the trash in Independence Square, emphasizes that the purpose of the movement was the narrow one of reversing election fraud and removing a corrupt president.

Although the nation continues to struggle with endemic corruption - the parliament recently called for snap elections for the Mayor of Kyiv following accusations he was involved in $3 billion in corrupt land deals - the country has taken significant steps forward in the development of democratic governance.

York points to four enduring legacies of the Orange Revolution: creation of a free press, election reforms which have provided three fair elections, enactment of constitutional reforms which created a healthier balance between the executive and legislative branches, and the awakening of a national political identity.

As the younger generation comes of age, that spark of a democratic consciousness is creating a Ukraine which is more closely tied to the Orange Revolution than its history as a Soviet Republic.

Whether that results in alignment toward the East or West remains the free choice of the people.

Source: The Record


Online Editor said…

Did Western spider spin Orange Web?
A new book claims to have uncovered the inside story behind Ukraine's Orange Revolution. Written by several international analysts, it accuses the West of having masterminded coups in post-Soviet countries.
The book whose title translates as “Orange Webs” is the first publication from a brand new Russian NGO, the Institute of Democracy and Co-operation, which aims to challenge Western views of Russia.

Four years ago thousands poured into Kiev’s Independence Square. Amid claims that the presidential poll was rigged, they demanded victory for their man, Viktor Yushchenko.

Now, a book is out in Russian detailing how the so-called “colour revolutions” were plotted and financed by the West.

“The way they were executed, planned and depicted in the media has one and the same technology behind it,” said Natalya Narochnitskaya, the editor of “Orange Webs.”

Claims that Washington poured millions of dollars into Ukraine’s opposition have already hit the headlines.

“Orange Webs” is a step-by-step guide of the why’s and how’s of a coup d’etat - a process, it claims, that toppled Serbia’s Slobodan Milosevic, lifted Georgia’s Mikhail Saakashvili to power and fuelled Kiev’s rallies.

Analyst John Laughland believes that “to get Ukraine into NATO, you have to have a pro-NATO government installed in power. As the Americans say it’s not rocket science.”

The book points the finger of blame at a number of foreign NGOs. One in particular, the Committee of Voters of Ukraine, is accused of using American money to campaign against the pro-Russian candidate Viktor Yanukovich - allegations it strongly denies.

“The money we received from Western donors was allocated specifically for monitoring the election. After that we haven’t got a penny from anyone,” said Aleksandr Chernenko from the NGO.

Analysts also say many activists from the Ukrainian pro-Yushchenko youth movement ‘Pora’ were trained by members of similar groups in Serbia and Georgia. The movement’s leader, Vladislav Kaskiv, has slammed the claims as pure propaganda.

“The Russian government isn’t interested in democratic changes. That’s why they use information wars to discredit the very idea of change through democratic movement,” he said.

The change was seen by many as a step towards democracy, but for the authors of the book it was an unlawful process.

The authors say they’ve got facts and figures never before made public to prove their point.

“Orange Webs” is now set to hit the shelves. If history is written by the winners, this book tries to provide an alternative account of what drove the revolutions forward.