Thursday, January 14, 2016

Many Puzzled By Obama's Reference To Ukraine As Russian 'Client State'

KIEV, Ukraine -- U.S. President Barack Obama raised eyebrows around the world with a difficult-to-interpret reference to Ukraine in his final annual State of the Union address that lumped the post-Soviet state and its West-leaning government together with Syria as Russian "client states."

Obama's reference to Ukraine as Russian 'Client State' was a stupid, undiplomatic remark. This reflects his total lack of understanding of today's geopolitical reality.

"Even as their economy contracts, Russia is pouring resources in to prop up Ukraine and Syria -- client states they saw slipping away from their orbit," Obama said on January 12.

"And the international system we built after World War II is now struggling to keep pace with this new reality."

In the transcript of the speech posted by the White House, the confusing reference remains, although the word "client" does not appear and the transcript uses the present tense ("states they see slipping away from their orbit").

The annual address to a joint session of the U.S. Congress is one of the U.S. president's most comprehensively prepared and vetted speeches.

Obama's chief speechwriter, Jon Favreau, told National Public Radio earlier in the day his office had been working on the speech since "around Thanksgiving."

"Once the new year came and went, there would be a frenzied couple of weeks writing and editing and rewriting, right up until the final speech and then practicing the speech on the last day," Favreau said. 

So the president's infelicitous comment about Ukraine is all the more difficult to understand.

Was Obama referring to Russia's support for former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, the pro-Russian leader who was driven from office by pro-democracy demonstrations in February 2014?

Or did he have in mind Moscow's economic, political, and military support for separatists in eastern Ukraine and Crimea, the Ukrainian Black Sea peninsula that Moscow annexed in March 2014? 

According to the White House, it was both.

"The president was referring in his remarks to Russia's previous long-term efforts to bolster the regime of former President Yanukovych as a way to prevent Ukraine from pursuing further integration with Europe," a senior U.S. administration official told RFE/RL on January 13.

The official, who could not be identified due to White House protocol, said the remarks also referred to Russia's "current occupation of Crimea, extensive efforts to support armed groups operating in eastern Ukraine, and other efforts to destabilize the country."

Prior to the White House clarification, officials in Ukraine were quick to stress that Obama's wording should not be taken as a sign that U.S. policy on Ukraine has shifted.

"It is important to make the right emphasis in assessing this comment," Svitlana Zalishchuk, a member of the Ukrainian Verkhovna Rada's Foreign Affairs Committee, told RFE/RL's Ukrainian Service.

"This is an error on the expression level, a failed impromptu. It shouldn't be considered as the position of the U.S. president on Ukraine."

Zalishchuk noted that Obama mentioned Ukraine twice in the speech, saying in the second reference that U.S. support for Ukraine and other countries transitioning to democracy helped make the world more stable.

Ostap Semerak, first deputy chairman of the parliamentary Committee for European Integration, also emphasized Obama's statement of support for Ukraine and his criticism of Moscow.

"Obama says [the United States] is helping Ukraine defend democracy," Semerak said.

"And that this strengthens the international order that was established after World War II. When Obama mentions this order, he talks about Russia and its aggressive policies. Ukraine is viewed as trying to maintain the system of peace that was formed after World War II and as opposed to Russia's bid to establish a new world order based on aggression." 

Oleg Bilokolos, an analyst with the Kiev-based Maidan of Foreign Affairs nongovernmental organization, told RFE/RL that one should not overemphasize Obama's "slips of the tongue."

"The main thing for us is that the Obama administration's policy on Ukraine remains unchanged, that democracy will be maintained, and that the United States will encourage maintaining [economic] sanctions against Russia" over Moscow's interference in Ukraine, Bilokolos said. 

'Did He Say That?' 

Western analysts and journalists -- to say nothing of Obama's U.S. political opponents -- were harsher in their reaction and less inclined to dismiss the remark as a "slip of the tongue."

Journalist Christopher Miller of Mashable wondered on Twitter:

"Misspoke? [Because] Moscow is [definitely] trying to destabilize Ukraine."

Former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Steven Pifer also said on Twitter the statement was an "odd line" because of Moscow's efforts to "destabilize Ukraine."

Journalist Julia Davis of Russian Media Monitor wrote that Obama's "choice of words is seriously wrong."

Lydia Tomkiw, a reporter with the International Business Times, wrote that the wording shows that "DC stopped paying attention [to Ukraine] a while ago, sadly."

On the brighter side, Tomkiw noted, Obama did not upset Ukrainians by referring to their country as "the Ukraine" -- an old-fashioned formulation seen by some as offensive, as it suggests Ukraine is a region rather than a country.

Representative Peter Roskam (Republican-Ohio) tweeted that "Ukraine is our ally, not a 'client state' of Russia, Mr. President."

He added that Obama's statement "shows an alarming lack of understanding of geopolitical realities." 

Source: Radio Free Europe


Yuanyuan Lin said...

5.05lllllyuannike free running
nike trainers
nike roshe run
marc jacobs sale
ferragamo shoes
tods shoes sale
tods outlet online
kobe 9 elite
abercrombie outlet
abercrombie outlet
abercrombie outlet
mac cosmetics sale
new balance outlet
converse shoes sale
polo pas cher
valentino shoes
giuseppe zanotti shoes
salomon shoes sale
celine outlet online

Xiaozhengm 520 said...

christian louboutin shoes
ralph lauren outlet
jordan 8
michael kors outlet clearance
tory burch outlet
ray ban sunglasses
lebron james shoes 13
michael kors outlet
timberland outlet
gucci handbags
supra shoes
louis vuitton handbags
jordan 4
kevin durant shoes 8
giuseppe zanotti sneakers
true religion jeans
air max 90
cheap oakleys
jordan shoes
caoch outlet
ray bans
louboutin pas cher
louis vuitton handbags
michael kors handbags
coach outlet
christian louboutin sale
cheap jordan shoes
coach factory outlet
ray ban sunglasses
christian louboutin outlet
nike sb shoes
fake watches
coach outlet
oakley sunglasses
michael kors handbags
louis vuitton outlet

dong dong23 said...

michael kors outlet
michael kors outlet online
michael kors outlet
burberry outlet
replica watches
oakley sunglasses wholesale
ray ban wayfarer
ralph lauren outlet
christian louboutin shoes
kevin durant shoes 8
louis vuitton handbags
christian louboutin sale
ralph lauren polo
giuseppe zanotti sneakers
replica rolex watches
louis vuitton handbags
vans shoes outlet
michael kors
ray ban sunglasses
true religion jeans
abercrombie kids
jordan 11
coach factory outlet
michael kors uk
lebron james shoes 13
air jordans
tods shoes
louis vuitton outlet
replica watches
longchamp handbags
christian louboutin outlet
insanity workout
coach outlet online
gucci outlet
coach factory outlet
cheap oakley sunglasses
oakley sunglasses
coach factory outlet

John said...

ed hardy outlet
cheap jordan shoes
ugg australia
ugg boots sale
adidas superstar
tiffany uk
armani exchange
nike air max
nhl jerseys wholesale
nike huarache black
reebok uk
christian louboutin uk
jordan pas cher
polo ralph lauren
ugg boots canada
ugg sale
true religion sale
louis vuitton outlet
moncler jackets outlet
ugg australia outlet
uggs pas cher
michael kors outlet online
air jordans
skechers shoes
rolex watches
ugg boots
coach outlet online
valentino outlet
montblanc pens
canada goose jackets
polo ralph lauren outlet online
adidas superstars
michael kors outlet store
ugg boots clearance
ugg boots outlet