Saturday, March 01, 2014

Pro-Russia Leader Of Crimea Claims Military Control, Coordinates With Russian Soldiers

SIMFEROPOL, Ukraine -- Crimea’s pro-Russian leader on Saturday claimed control of the military and police there, saying soldiers from Russia’s Black Sea Fleet are guarding government buildings now and his regional government is coordinating directly with them.


Russian soldiers patrol the street outside Simferopol airport in the Crimea region of Ukraine, Feb. 28, 2014.

Early Saturday, armed men in helmets and green fatigues replaced local police in front of the regional parliament.

Prime Minister Serhiy Aksyonov appealed to Russian President Vladi­mir Putin for help maintaining “peace and tranquility.”

Moscow politicians moved in what appeared to be well-choreographed steps after the request.

First, Sergei Naryshkin, speaker of the lower house, said Russian parliamentarians had appealed to Putin “to take measures to stabilize the situation in Crimea and use all available means to protect the people of Crimea from tyranny and violence.”

Then came Valentina Matviyenko, chairman of the upper house.

“Perhaps in this situation we could grant the Crimean government’s request,” she said, “and send a limited contingent there to provide security for the Black Sea Fleet and Russian citizens living in Crimea.”

She said the decision was up to Putin, but added, “We should protect the people.” 

Aksyonov, who became prime minister Thursday, belongs to the Russian Unity party in Crimea, which won about 4 percent of the vote in the last parliamentary election. 

In making his plea, Aksyonov noted that the central government of Ukraine does not control the situation in the region, as evidenced by the “unidentified” armed men and military equipment that have become so visible.

The Russian foreign ministry said “unidentified gunmen directed from Kiev” had tried to capture the Crimean interior ministry headquarters.

Calling the attempt a “treacherous provocation,” which resulted in casualties, Moscow said that “decisive action” had repelled the “vigilante groups.”

“This confirms the desire of prominent political circles in Kiev to destabilize the peninsula,” the foreign ministry said, in a statement posted on its website.

“We encourage those who give such orders from Kiev to show restraint. We believe it is irresponsible to continue whipping up the already tense situation in the Crimea.” 

Heightened Russian military activity in Crimea on Friday prompted a stern warning from President Obama and a deepening sense of crisis among the leaders of the new Ukrainian government in Kiev.

U.S. officials said Russian troops had entered Crimea, and Obama told reporters Friday evening that he was “deeply concerned by reports of military movements” and that there “will be costs for any military intervention.”

Earlier in the day, the new Ukrainian government said that hundreds of soldiers in green camouflage, without insignia but carrying military-style automatic rifles, had taken over two airports in Crimea.

Regularly scheduled flights continued, at least until nightfall, when the airspace above Crimea, a region of Ukraine with deep ties to Russia, was suddenly declared closed.

Internet videos of Russian military helicopters flying over Crimea’s muddy winter fields went viral Friday.

Russian IL-76 planes suspected of carrying 2,000 troops landed at a military base in Gvardiysky, near the regional capital of Simferopol, according to Crimea’s ATR television.

Russia’s Foreign Ministry said Moscow had informed Ukraine that it would be moving armored units from its Black Sea navy base in the city of Sevastopol deeper into Crimean territory to protect its operations.

In his remarks, Obama avoided confirming the Russian military movements.

But U.S. officials said that confirmation of an influx of troops had prompted the president to speak.

“Any violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity would be deeply destabilizing, which is not in the interests of Ukraine, Russia or Europe,” Obama said.

Whether the Russians were coming, or already here, consumed an anxious new government in Kiev and the residents of Crimea.

The armed men at the airports refused to answer any questions.

Residents and outside experts speculated that they might be local paramilitaries, security contractors or even members of an anti-riot police unit that was blamed for the deaths of protesters who packed Kiev’s Independence Square in recent months, leading to the ouster last week of President Viktor Yanukovych.

The unit, called the Berkut, was disbanded by the Ukrainian parliament this week and then welcomed to Crimea as heroes.

The men also could have been Russian troops, including members from special anti-terrorist squads used to protect Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, which is anchored here.

Units from the Russian fleet are often seen on the highways here.

The Ukrainian parliament demanded that Russia halt what lawmakers described as violations of Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.

“What is happening can be called an armed invasion and occupation. In violation of all international treaties and norms. This is a direct provocation for armed bloodshed in the territory of a sovereign state,” said Arsen Avakov, Ukraine’s new interior minister.

The U.N. Security Council held an emergency, closed-door meeting Friday in response to a request from Ukraine’s U.N. ambassador, Yuriy Sergeyev, who cited “the deterioration of the situation” in Crimea.

The U.S. officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity about internal deliberations, declined to provide numbers or specific locations of Russian deployments.

Sergeyev told the Security Council that there had been an “illegal crossing [of] the borders by Russian military transport aircraft IL-76, about 10 of them, and that 11 military attack helicopters had also violated Ukrainian air space.”

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) said in a statement Friday that “it appears that the Russian military now controls the Crimean peninsula.”

An administration official said options being considered by the United States and its European partners if the Russians do not pull back included canceling attendance at the June G-8 summit to be held in Sochi, site of the Winter Olympics, and rejecting Russian overtures for deepening trade and commercial ties.

The official also cited an indirect impact on the value of the ruble.

There was no overt discussion of a Western military response.

Asked what Ukraine wanted the international community to do, Sergeyev told reporters after the Security Council meeting:

“We want you to help us bring the truth around the world. . . . Political support — do everything possible in insurance of preventive diplomacy. Still we have a chance to stop the negative developments . . . with strong voice around the world.”

The council decided to send a mediator to Ukraine and indicated that it may hold further meetings.

In a speech Friday evening, Ukraine’s interim president, Oleksandr Turchynov, accused Moscow of “trying to provoke” Kiev into an “armed conflict.”

Turchynov said the Russians were pursing an “Abkhazia plan,” suggesting that Moscow was interested in a reprise of its 2008 war with Georgia, where it wrested control of two breakaway republics, South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

But Ukraine is much larger — and far more complicated — perhaps requiring a more subtle strategy.

That line of thinking led to speculation that Russia was encouraging loyal civilian ­forces to put on unmarked uniforms, take up arms and hold ground for Russian troops, should they be deployed.

Ukraine’s new leaders assert that troops from the Black Sea Fleet had also blocked entrances to Belbek’s dual civilian and military airport near Sevastopol.

A spokesman for the Black Sea Fleet denied the reports that its troops were involved, according to the Interfax news agency.

“No subdivision of the Black Sea Fleet has been advanced into the Belbek area, let alone involved in blocking it,” the spokesman said.

“Given the unstable situation around the Black Sea Fleet ­bases in the Crimea, and the places where our service members live with their families, security has been stepped by the Black Sea Fleet’s anti-terror units.”

At the Belbek airport, armed men and a military transport truck blocked the entrance.

Whoever the men were, they did not resemble the more motley civilian self-defense militias operating here.

They were trained soldiers.

When a man who appeared to be a Russian officer with two bodyguards approached them, they spread out in defensive, flanking positions, squatted, their fingers off the triggers, and waited for orders.

A convoy of armored personnel carriers stopped alongside a major highway here, and soldiers inside one of the vehicles said in a brief interview that they were Russian Federation troops, from a base in the Krasnodar region, about 300 miles to the east in Russia.

In the Balaklava district near Sevastopol, at least 20 men wearing the uniform of the Black Sea Fleet and carrying automatic rifles surrounded a Ukrainian border guard post Friday, initiating a tense standoff with the border police inside, Reuters news agency reported.

In Moscow, Russian President Vladimir Putin broke his week-long silence on Ukraine with a mixed message.

He ordered Russian officials to consult with other nations as well as the International Monetary Fund on means of financial assistance for Ukraine.

He also said that efforts to maintain and promote trade between Russia and Ukraine should continue.

At the same time, Putin said Moscow would consider the possibility of sending humanitarian supplies to Crimea.

Secretary of State John F. Kerry spoke Friday with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.

“We raised the issue of the airports, raised the issue of armored vehicles, raised the issue of personnel in various places,” Kerry said.

“And while we were told that they are not engaging in any violation of the sovereignty and do not intend to, I nevertheless made it clear that that could be misinterpreted at this moment, and that there are enough tensions that it is important for everybody to be extremely careful not to inflame the situation and not to send the wrong messages.”

Source: The Washington Post

2 comments:

Igor Skakovsky said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Igor Skakovsky said...

Before Russia officially decided to use force days before that, they used the force illegally.
It is all done during the time when US have a tough talk but, at the same time simply look the other way.
US are afraid to break the relations with Russia because Russia is playing the key roll on nuclear talks with Iran. The world politics are never fair and never will be. There are no justices in the world. Big guys always do what is good for them; they always will use and abuse the wicker once. If you want to be treat better get a bigger stick, at least you get some respect.