Tuesday, March 04, 2014

Citing ‘Coup’ In Ukraine, Putin Reserves Right To Use Force

MOSCOW, Russia -- President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia on Tuesday described the crisis in Ukraine as the result of an “unconstitutional coup,” and said that Russia reserved right to use force as “a last resort.”


Vladimir V. Putin (C)

He was speaking as Secretary of State John Kerry headed for Kiev to meet with Ukraine’s fledgling leadership, which forced Mr. Yanukovych out of office.

In televised remarks, Mr. Putin also said there was no need to use force at the moment in Crimea, Ukraine’s southern region on the Black Sea where Russian troops and naval vessels have encircled Ukrainian military facilities, saying they were protecting ethnic Russians.

But, in what could herald a broadening of the crisis, he said Russia would use “all options” to confront lawlessness in eastern Ukraine, which has traditionally been pro-Russia.

He said any intervention would be “legitimate and within the framework of international law.”

“What could trigger the use of military force?” he said.

“As you know, the legitimate president, Yanukovych, requested Russia to use military force to defend the lives and health of Ukrainians. Our major concern is the orgy that is happening – so many nationalists and radical extremists that are on the streets of Kiev.”

“We realized what was the major concern for the Ukrainians, the Russian-speaking people who reside on the southern and eastern regions of Ukraine, this is concern about lawlessness,” Mr. Putin said.

“When they ask us for help – and we do have an official request from the president – we reserve the right to defend these people and we believe this is legitimate.”

The Kremlin leader took issue with Western threats of reprisals, including sanctions and a boycott of the meeting of the Group of 8 industrial nations that is scheduled to be held in Russia.

“All threats against Russia are counterproductive and harmful,” he said, according to Reuters, adding that Russia was ready to host the G-8 but Western leaders who did not want to attend “don’t need to.”

Mr. Putin acknowledged that had met two days ago with Mr. Yanukovych, saying he was “safe and sound” and dismissing rumors that the ousted Ukrainian president had died of a heart attack.

Mr. Putin’s remarks came after declared the scheduled end of a military exercise he ordered in western Russia near Ukraine’s border last week, telling military units that participated to return to their permanent garrisons.

There was no indication that Mr. Putin’s move presaged any easing of a crisis that has raised Western fears that the region may be spinning toward a broader conflict.

Tension remained high in Crimea, where Russian troops are blockading Ukrainian military facilities in what the authorities in Kiev have called a declaration of war.

He denied that military personnel in unmarked uniforms who now control much of Crimea are Russian forces, describing them instead as “local defense forces.”

“Look at the people who were operating in Kiev – they were very well trained at special camps in Poland and Lithuania, they were trained by special structures,” he said.

“Why do you think that the self-defense forces in Crimea should be any less professional.”

He said Russia is not considering annexing Crimea, but said Crimean citizens should be allowed to determine their own future, presumably as part of Russia or Ukraine.

 “We are not considering this possibility,” he said.

“It’s up to people living in a certain territory, if they can exercise their free will, and determine their future.

For example, if Kosovo’s Albanians were allowed to do that, self-determination, which according to U.N. documents is a right, but we will never instigate it, never support such trends.”

“Only the people who live in a certain territory have the right to decide their own future,” he said.

But in a graphic illustration of the standoff and its potential hazards, Russian troops on Tuesday fired warning shots in the air as approximately 200 unarmed Ukrainian soldiers approached Russian positions on the perimeter of the contested Belbek airfield in Crimea to press demands to return to their positions there and conduct joint patrols.

In Moscow, the Kremlin responded to American warnings of economic punishment and isolation for its actions in Crimea with a counter threat that Moscow might abandon the dollar as a reserve currency and refuse to repay loans to American banks, Reuters reported.

The warning came from Sergei Glazyev, a Kremlin aide with limited influence over the formulation of a policy but boasting a reputation for staking out hard-line positions, the news agency said.

Mr. Kerry was expected to meet with the fledgling Ukrainian leadership that forced President Yanukovych to flee to Russia last month as the crisis deepened.

He will be the highest-ranking Western official to meet the administration, signaling the Obama administration’s support for a government that the Kremlin does not recognize.

The Russian military exercise coincided with the deployment of Russian special forces troops to Crimea beginning last Friday, though officials maintained it was not directly related to the conflict in Ukraine.

Nothing the Kremlin reported on Tuesday suggested that the Russian operations in Crimea would end.

The military exercise involved the mobilization of the entire Western Military District, which stretches from the border of Ukraine to the Arctic, as well as units from the Central Military District, the Baltic Fleet and air defense commands.

The troops dispatched to Ukraine are reported to have deployed from ports and airfields in the Southern Military District.

Mr. Putin ordered the mobilization only days before Russian forces began spreading through Crimea, and despite officials’ reassurances to the contrary, the timing and scale of the operations had a palpable message.

Mr. Putin attended the culmination of the exercises near St. Petersburg on Monday, appearing in state television reports observing live-fire training involving tanks and helicopters.

The Kremlin announced the end of the maneuvers – which involved 150,000 troops, as well as air and naval forces and live-fire demonstrations in several Russian bases – and reported that they had been “successfully carried out.”

On Monday, the embattled new government of Ukraine accused Russian forces of a major escalation in military pressure over control of the Crimean Peninsula, saying Russia had deployed 16,000 troops in the region over the last week and had demanded that Ukrainian forces there surrender within hours or face armed assault. 

Russia denied it had issued any ultimatum and no fighting was reported, but Moscow was clearly moving to strengthen its grip on Crimea, brushing aside new warnings of economic punishment and isolation from President Obama and European leaders.

At the United Nations, where the Security Council met for the third time in an emergency session since Friday, the Ukrainian ambassador, Yuriy Sergeyev, distributed a three-page letter asserting that the Russians had sent 16,000 troops into the Crimean Peninsula since Feb. 24.

The troops, Mr. Sergeyev wrote, had moved to “seize, block and control crucial governmental and military objects of Ukraine in Crimea.”

The Interfax-Ukraine news agency quoted an unidentified Ukrainian Defense Ministry official as saying that Russia’s Black Sea Fleet commander had set a deadline of 5 a.m. Tuesday for Ukrainian forces stationed in Crimea to lay down their weapons, and that many Ukrainian soldiers seemed to have taken the threat seriously.

Russia’s Interfax news agency said the Black Sea Fleet had no such plans, and the would-be deadline came and went, apparently uneventfully.

Still, the conflicting reports only served further to worsen tensions in the Ukrainian crisis, which has grown drastically in the past few weeks to a new confrontation between Russia and the West reminiscent of low points in the Cold War.

Russia has denied Western accusations that it flouted international law in asserting military control in Crimea, a historically Russian region that is home to its Black Sea naval base.

The Russians have asserted that they moved to protect their legitimate interests there after President Yanukovych fled more than a week ago after protests in Kiev against his shift toward closer relations with Russia.

The Kremlin still regards him as Ukraine’s legitimate president.

The Security Council meeting in New York was requested by Russia’s ambassador, Vitaly I. Churkin, who told fellow members that Russia had acted to thwart what he called threats by ultranationalists, including anti-Semites, against Russians and Russian speakers inside Ukraine.

Mr. Churkin also held up a copy of a letter from Mr. Yanukovych to Russia asking for military help. 

Yet the Security Council meeting quickly became a venue for East-West diplomatic gibes and rejoinders.

The British ambassador, Sir Mark Lyall Grant, called Russia’s justification bogus, while the envoy from Lithuania, Raimonda Murmokaite, told the Council it “resurrects the memory of darkest pages of the 20th century.”

After Mr. Churkin had spoken, Samantha Power, the United States ambassador to the United Nations, said, “Listening to the representative of Russia, one might think that Moscow had just become the rapid response arm of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.”

The Council took no action, and it remained unclear what — if anything — it might agree to do, since Russia, a permanent member, has veto power.

Although Crimea was relatively calm on Monday, Russian forces tightened their grip on key military bases and other facilities throughout the peninsula, including naval installations and outposts of the border police, and stepped up pressure on Ukrainian officials to declare their loyalty to pro-Russian authorities.

Source: The New York Times

2 comments:

Igor Skakovsky said...

It is worth to note that some of principles used by Russia in international relations especially concerning Ukraine based on the policies and principles of Tsarist Russia. Perhaps many of them are beneficial for Russia even they originate couple of hundreds of years ago but, I most certain that those principals must be changed or amended for the fraternal brothers such as Ukraine and Belarus, especially in 21st century, if Russia has any plans to have a friendly nation for its neighbor. There is deeply rooted mistrust in the Western parts of Ukraine to Russia. It will take time to change that but Russia should be pro active in changing that.

JURIS ET DE JURE said...

Once again our humanistic
international press fails to understand the eternal influence
of ALMIGHTY GOD; and
that being the age long record
that one plus God has always proved
to be a winning combination.

This being the case: I pray for a call to prayer on behalf of
our brothers and sisters in Christ
who wish so very much to live for the Lord in quiet. The angelic realm at the disposal of our Almighty Father far exceeds the material hardware of the oppressor.

Finally we must pray for Putin's
spiritual condition...before it is eternally to late to make a personal decision for a relationship in Jesus Christ:
For God so loved the world that He gave His only Begotten son...
that whosoever believeth on Him should not perish! Mr. Putin
the reality is Hell or Heaven
you must choose today...the eternity of Hell is real but you decide.

John 14:6
Shepard